For engineering leads
A spreadsheet of 8,000 violations is not a backlog. limena gives you deduplicated, component-level tickets with the file, the fix, and a check that stops the regression coming back.
Most accessibility tools create work for you, not with you.
The output arrives as a CSV, sized in thousands, with no indication of which items are the same problem or where in the codebase they live.
Counted, not grouped
Eight thousand rows where 6,489 are one card component rendered across the catalogue. The number tells you nothing about the size of the job.
No location
A CSS selector is not a file path. Someone has to reverse engineer which component produced the markup before any work can start.
It comes back
Nothing verifies the fix held. A dependency bump reverts it and the same barrier reappears in the next audit as a brand new finding.
01 · A ticket, not a row
Deduplicated to the component that causes it.
1,842 reported violations are usually one shared component rendered 614 times. limena groups them back to the source file so the work is sized honestly.
Each ticket carries the file, the line, a diff, and the criterion. It lands in Linear, Jira, or GitHub with your existing labels.
src/checkout/PaymentFields.tsx · line 84
- <input placeholder="Card number" />
+ <label htmlFor="cc-num">Card number</label>
+ <input id="cc-num" />One component, 3 fields, every order. Closing this ticket resolves 1,842 reported violations across the catalogue.
02 · In the pipeline
Fails the build, not the retro.
limena runs on every pull request and reports as a check. New blocking barriers fail; existing ones do not, so you are never blocked by a backlog you inherited.
Already running axe-core? POST your results and keep your test setup, limena handles the deduplication, ownership, and evidence on top.
- checkout · 4 pagespass
- product · 12 templatespass
- cart · 2 pagespass
- campaign/holiday · focus trapnew
1 new blocking barrier introduced by this PR.
Pre-existing findings do not fail the build.
03 · It stays fixed
The work does not come back next quarter.
Every fix becomes a check. limena knows what was resolved and in which release, so a dependency bump that quietly removes focus styles is flagged as a regression rather than rediscovered a year later as a new finding.
That is the difference between paying for accessibility once and paying for it every audit cycle.
v7.4 reintroduced a fixed barrier. A dependency bump replaced the focus styles on the button component. Caught in CI, reverted the same day.
Accessibility work sized like engineering work.
- Twelve tickets instead of eight thousand rows, each scoped to the component that causes the barrier.
- File, line, diff, and criterion on every ticket, in the tracker your team already uses.
- A CI check that fails new barriers and ignores the backlog you inherited.
- Fixes verified at release, so the same work does not reappear at the next audit.
Point it at a branch.
We will show you the real ticket count behind the violation count, and what the first three fixes clear.