← Use cases

Accessibility for government

Nobody can opt out of your services. When a form is inaccessible, the fallback is a phone queue, an office visit, or going without a benefit someone is entitled to.

Service estate6 services · 41,000 pages
2 statutory services blocked
2
statutory services blocked
no offline route
184k
claims a year affected
benefit service
4
vendor-built services
2 renewals due
6
need a specialist verdict
queued
Benefit claim
Errors in colour only · paper form retired
STATUTORYFail12
Licence renewal
Date picker unusable with a screen reader
STATUTORYFail9
Permit applications
Vendor platform · renewal in October
VENDORAttention21
Public consultations
Untagged PDFs · 1,900 documents
DOCSAttention34
Main information site
Central digital team · weekly releases
IN HOUSEPass0
Open data portal
Vendor platform · VPAT on file
VENDORPass0

There is no competitor to switch to.

Commercial sites lose a customer. You leave a resident unable to renew a licence, file a return, or claim a benefit, and the obligation to serve them does not go away.

Digital-first removed the fallback

Paper forms and counters were retired to save money. That was defensible only if the digital route worked for everyone, and for some services it does not.

The estate is procured, not built

Most services run on vendor platforms you cannot patch. Evidence has to be strong enough to move a supplier or a renewal negotiation.

A complaint becomes a public matter

In the private sector this is a support ticket. Here it can become an access-to-information request, an ombudsman file, or a news story.

01 · Ranked by who is shut out

A blocked benefit claim outranks everything else.

limena scores by what a person cannot complete and whether another route exists. Statutory services with no offline alternative come first, and a policy page with the same rule violation comes last.

Forms are almost always the surface that matters, and almost always the least tested.

Fix these firstby service impact
01Benefit claim errors in colour onlyStatutory

No announced reason for rejection, and no paper alternative. The claim simply cannot be completed.

02Licence renewal date picker unusableStatutory

Only self-serve route to renew. Fallback is a 22 minute assisted call.

03Contrast on policy library pagesInformational

Content available in other formats and reflows correctly at 200 percent zoom.

02 · Consequence, not category

What happens to the person who cannot get through.

limena states the fallback: a phone queue, an office visit, or nothing. That is the language a service owner and a minister's office both understand, and it is also what appears in a complaint.

Findings needing human judgment are flagged for your specialist rather than passed as automated.

Fail

Benefit claim errors are announced only in colour

Error

When a claim is rejected, the failing fields turn red with no announced message and no programmatic association. A screen reader user submits, hears nothing change, and has no way to know which answer was wrong.

Service impact

Statutory service, 184,000 claims a year, no offline alternative since the paper form was retired. Blocked residents fall back to a 22 minute assisted call or abandon the claim.

SDService delivery, digital teamAlso queued for a specialist verdict before sign-offQueue for review

03 · Legislated, and audited

One record, every standard you answer to.

Most of your estate is vendor-built and procured, so the lever is the contract. limena holds each supplier to the same bar and produces the evidence pack that goes into a renewal or an accessibility complaint response.

Multiple jurisdictions resolve to the highest bar, so one programme satisfies all of them rather than running three.

Standards in scopeExport
  • Accessible Canada ActFederal obligationWCAG 2.1 AA
  • AODA, OntarioProvincial obligationWCAG 2.0 AA
  • EN 301 549For EU-facing servicesWCAG 2.1 AA
  • Resolved targetHighest bar across all fourWCAG 2.2 AA

All four resolve to WCAG 2.2 AA, so the programme is run once against the highest bar.

Services that work for everyone entitled to use them.

  • Statutory services separated from informational pages, so the work starts where residents are actually shut out.
  • Barriers stated as consequences, in language a service owner and an ombudsman both understand.
  • Vendor findings packaged for renewal negotiations, where you have leverage you do not have in code.
  • One programme satisfying every standard you answer to, run against the highest bar rather than three times.

Start with your busiest form.

The one most residents have to get through, and the one most likely to be blocking someone today.